Tuesday, April 29, 2008

America Won The Vietnam War...But Not In The Way We Thought We Would

The Vietnam War continues to hover over the American consciousness decades after it has ended. One reason is the war in Iraq, which has been going on for over five years now and which for some has parallels with the Vietnam War, and the other reason is that the Republican presidential candidate, John McCain, was a prisoner of war in Vietnam for five and a half years.

As with the war in Iraq, there are generally two competing narratives concerning the war in Vietnam. One side argues that the war was unwinnable and that we should never have gotten involved there in the first place. The other side claims that America would have won a military victory in Vietnam if our efforts were not undermined by a biased media that misrepresented the war to the American people, and antiwar demonstrators who gave encouragement to the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong.

This week's issue of The Economist contains a special report on Vietnam (subscription required). Upon reading it, I could not help but think how modern day Vietnam renders this debate moot. A few snippets from The Economist report below are rather telling.

On the economic front:

An agricultural miracle has turned a country of 85m once barely able to feed itself into one of the world's main providers of farm produce. Vietnam has also become a big exporter of clothes, shoes and furniture, soon to be joined by microchips when Intel opens its $1 billion factory near the capital, Hanoi. Imports of machinery are soaring. Exports plus imports equal 160% of GDP, making the economy one of the world's most open.

Vietnam's Communists conceded economic defeat 22 years ago, in the depths of a crisis, and brought in market-based reforms called doi moi (renewal), similar to those Deng Xiaoping had introduced in China a few years earlier. As in China, it took time for the effects to show up, but over the past few years economic liberalisation has been fostering rapid, poverty-reducing growth.

And in the foreign policy realm:

Vietnam has carefully rebuilt relations with both America and China. It is probably more enthusiastic about its friendship with America, which has more to offer it in terms of foreign investment and expertise. In November two American warships became the first to visit northern Vietnam in peacetime. Even before the restoration of relations Vietnam was co-operating with America in searching for the remains of soldiers missing in action.

Vietnam's overriding interest in its foreign relations has been to accelerate its economic development. The main point of having “friends everywhere” is to seek their investment and their technical help. Another goal is seeking and maintaining trade access for Vietnamese farm produce and manufactures. Vo Tri Thanh, a trade economist in Hanoi, argues that Vietnam could play a positive role in the Doha round of world trade talks as a fairly poor country that nevertheless strongly supports freer trade. In the absence of progress on the Doha round, Vietnam is seeking bilateral and regional trade deals. It has started talking to Japan about a free-trade agreement, and diplomats say there is a chance that the limited trade-liberalisation pacts struck with America could develop into a full-blown free-trade deal.

And to think that some Americans several decades ago believed that if we did not fight them in Saigon, we would have to fight them in San Diego!

No longer a source of refugees fleeing desperate poverty or a Marxist state seeking to export its revolution elsewhere (though some will dispute that that was ever a goal of the Vietnamese Communists in the first place), Vietnam is an increasingly prosperous country that is generally at peace with its neighbors. It has had diplomatic and trade relations with the United States for over a dozen years, during which time our greatest source of conflict has been over catfish. If a gung-ho supporter of American military intervention in Vietnam had fallen asleep in 1965 and woke up today, he might be forgiven for thinking that America had won the war in Vietnam. In other words, apart from still being politically a Communist one party state, Vietnam today probably looks pretty much like what supporters of the war had hoped it would turn out to be some forty years ago if things had turned out like they planned. As for whether or not our military involvement in Vietnam helped or hindered the present day state of affairs, that is a different academic debate.

9 comments:

Mercurious said...

And one can only imagine that Cuba would have posed no problem whatsoever if we had simply had open trading with them.

Having grown up in the Vietnam years, though (I still have my draft lottery letter), I would insist that it was a colossal blunder, even greater than Iraq. Vietnam was never a winnable conflict.

Anonymous said...

You have to express more your opinion to attract more readers, because just a video or plain text without any personal approach is not that valuable. But it is just form my point of view

Anonymous said...

I really like when people are expressing their opinion and thought. So I like the way you are writing

Term Papers said...

I have been visiting various blogs for my term papers writing research. I have found your blog to be quite useful. Keep updating your blog with valuable information... Regards

Anonymous said...

auto spot lamps http://pqx.in/maserati/maserati/dealer/chicago javers mercedes repair newburgh
[url=http://pqx.in/jeeps/jeep/wallpapers]automobile navigation systems[/url] mercedes benz australia price [url=http://pqx.in/isuzu/isuzu/trooper/2001]isuzu trooper 2001[/url]
used import auto gas tanks http://pqx.in/mercedes/mercedes/crossover
[url=http://pqx.in/volvo/volvo/oem/video/v70]cheats codes for gand theft auto[/url] santa clara county police auto auction [url=http://pqx.in/dodge/dodge/durango/factory/rims]dodge durango factory rims[/url]
maple ridge auto sales http://pqx.in/hyundai/hyundai/and/kia/sedona/blog
[url=http://pqx.in/maserati/maserati/1967]automobile dealer incentives[/url] mercedes cdi220 [url=http://pqx.in/fiat/prix/radiateur/fiat/panda/1992]prix radiateur fiat panda 1992[/url]

Anonymous said...

Interesting article it shows interesting info.

Dean said...

greetings to all.
I would first like to thank the writers of this blog by sharing information, a few years ago I read a book called costa rica investment in this book deal with questions like this one.

niz said...

Hello .. firstly I would like to send greetings to all readers. After this, I recognize the content so interesting about this article. For me personally I liked all the information. I would like to know of cases like this more often. In my personal experience I might mention a book called Generic Viagra in this book that I mentioned have very interesting topics, and also you have much to do with the main theme of this article.

William said...

You need to continue your research into the history of Vietnam, particularly after April 30, 1975.

The North Vietnamese government and its communist allies killed an estimated 7.5 million people including South Vietnamese, Cambodians and Laotians after the withdrawal of US support. Perhaps you should interview a former South Vietnamese citizen and ask them about conditions in Vietnam since 1975.

It is reasonable to assume that with continued US support, South Vietnam would have remained an independent democracy with personal and economic freedoms, like South Korea following the Korean conflict.